ASSIGNMENT
ON
APPROACHES TO CURRICULUM ORGANIZATION
CONTENTS
· Introduction
· Types of Approaches
- Topical
approach
- Concentric
approach
- Spiral
approach
- Historic
approach
- Type
study
- Nature
study
- Nature
rambling
- General
Science and Disciplinary approach
· Conclusion
Introduction
The term curriculum
is derived from the Latin word currere which mean path. In this sense
curriculum is the path through which the student has to go forward in order to
reach the goal envisaged by education usually the term curriculum is understood
as a group of subjects prescribed for study in a particular course. But
curriculum is not confined to this narrow concept. Curriculum should in
no way to considered as synonymous with courses of study. The course
course of study does list much of the content to be learnt and indicate some of
the major activities but these form only part of the curriculum.
Curriculum should be considered as a broad-based term encompassing every aspect
concerning a course of study. Curriculum for a course of study may be
conceived us the totality of experiences a pupil is exposed to within the
boundaries of the school and outside while undergoing that course, with a view
to achieve the anticipated educational goals.
Curriculum has been defined by different
persons in different ways: “Curriculum is a tool
in the hands of artists (teacher) to mould his material (pupils) according to
his ideals (objectives) in his studio (school)” by Arthur Cunningham.”Curriculum is that which the pupil is taught.
It involves more than the act of learning and quiet study. It involves
occupations, productions, achievement, exercise and activity” by H.H.
Horne.
Curriculum approach is a way of dealing with a
curriculum, a way of doing /creating/ designing/ thinking about a curriculum. Curriculum practitioners and implementers may
use one or more approaches in planning, implementing and evaluating the
curriculum. Even the text book writers or instructional material
producers have different curriculum approaches.
Types
of Approaches
There are different types of curricular approaches.
The approaches are
- Topical
approach
- Concentric
approach
- Spiral
approach
- Historic
approach
- Type
study
- Nature
study
- Nature
rambling
- General
Science and Disciplinary approach
1)
Topical approach
In this method a
particular topic is started in a particular grade and finished over there only.
Thus topic marked for particular grade must not be touch in other grade. The
selected topic becomes the centre of correlation. It is opposite of concentric
method. Concentric method involves the breaking up of a topic into suitable
portions, whereas topical method aims at keeping it intact. In topical method a
topic is taken as unbreakable unit. It is based on the principal that any topic
when begun should not be left half done. It should be finished in its entirety,
before the next topic is taken.
‘Topical method’ is more a system of arrangement of subject
matter than a method of teaching. Its adoption depends on a suitable
organization of the syllabus. The topic is to be taught at as stretch, without
a break or a gap. The other approach to this method is that a topic is selected
and is made the basis many other topics. The selected topic becomes the centre
of correlation.
Merits of Topical
method:
1.
Continuous teaching of topic not only save the student from
divided attention, but may ensure their full and whole – hearted concentration
on the topic. A natural link and sequence will exist in the day today work in
class room. The student’s complete attention, ability and capacity will be
directed exclusively to the topic under study for a sufficiently long time.
2.
When a topic is treated as centre for other topic, it
facilitates the learning process. It illustrates the advantage of correlation.
Drawbacks of Topical
methods
1.
Keeping psychological reason in view, it will be foolish to take
a topic like area in grade 4 and try to finish in at one stretch. The student
may be able to understand the elementary portion, but will certainly not be
able to attempt its most difficult question.
2.
The interest of the student may go away within a month, if we
focus on only on a particular topic.
3.
This method does not provide any opportunity for year to year
revision.
2)
Concentric approach
This method implies
breaking up of topic into different subtopic and the portion is allotted to
different grades. This is a system of organising a course rather than a method
of teaching. It is, therefore, better to call it concentric system or approach.
It implies widening of knowledge just as concentric circles go on extending and
widening. It is a system of arrangement of subject matter. In this method the
study of the topic is spread over a number of years. It is based on the
principle that subject cannot be given an exhaustive treatment at the first
stage. To begin with, a simple presentation of the subject is given and
further knowledge is imparted in following years. Thus beginning from a nucleus
the circles of knowledge go on widening year after year and hence the name
concentric method.
A topic
is divided into a number of portions which are then allotted to different
classes. The criterion for allotment of a particular portion of the course to a
particular class is the difficulty of portion and power of comprehension of
students in the age group. Thus it is mainly concerned with year to year
teaching but its influence can also be exercised in day-to-day teaching
Knowledge being given today should follow from knowledge given yesterday and
should lead to teaching on following day.
Merits of Concentric Method
(i) This
method of organisation of subject matter is decidedly superior to that in which
one topic is taken up in particular class and an effort is made to deal with
all aspects of the topic in that particular class.
(ii) It provides
a framework from course which is of real value to students.
(iii) The
system is most successful when the teaching is in hand of one teacher because
then he can preserve continuity in the teaching and keeps his expanding circle
concentric.
(iv) It provides
opportunity for revision of work already covered in a previous class and
carrying out new work.
(v) It enables the teacher to cover a portion according
to receptivity of learner.
(vi) Since the same topic is learnt over many years so
its impressions are more lasting.
(vii) It does not allow teaching to become dull because
every year a new interest can be given to the topic. Every year there are new
problems to solve and new difficulties to overcome.
Drawbacks
For the
success of this approach we require really capable teacher. If a teacher
becomes over ambitious and exhausts all the possible interesting illustrations
in there introductory year then the subject loses its power of freshness and
appeal and nothing is left to create interest in the topic in subsequent
years.In case the topic is too short or too long then also the method is not
found to be useful. A too long portion makes the topic dull and a too short
portion fails to leave any permanent and lasting impression on the mind of the
pupil.
3) Spiral approach
The
spiral approach is a technique often used in teaching or
textbooks where
first the basic facts of a subject are learned, without worrying about details.
Then as learning progresses, more and more details are introduced, while at the
same time they are related to the basics which are reemphasized many times to
help enter them into
long-term
memory. This principle is somewhat similar to the
inverted pyramid method used in
writing news stories, and the game
20
questions.
Jerome Bruner proposed the spiral curriculum as
a teaching approach in which each subject or skill area is revisited at
intervals, at a more sophisticated level each time. First there is basic
knowledge of a subject, then more sophistication is added, reinforcing principles
that were first discussed. This system is used in China and India. Bruner's
spiral curriculum, however, draws heavily from evolution to explain how to
learn better and thus it drew criticism from conservatives.
The spiral curriculum is defined as a curriculum that
returns to the same topics over time. It is juxtaposed to methods that involve
learning something then moving on, perhaps never to engage with it again. When
students re-engage with a topic repeatedly, they both consolidate prior
knowledge in their memory and build on it over time.
Advantages
- Developmentally
Appropriate Learning: Often times, we will challenge a student to the
furthest extent of their current abilities. Once we’ve gone as far as we
can go, we might have to wait a few months or even a year until their mind
has developed some more and they are more capable of grappling with the
topic. When you return to the topic, the student may be at a
developmentally appropriate level to understand the topic even more. This
advantage relies on the cognitive constructivist premise that brains
develop as we age, often in distinct stages (vis-a-vis Piaget’s stage
theory).
- Prior
Knowledge is Central to Learning: This approach necessarily employs the notion of ‘prior
knowledge’. This concept acknowledges that students enter a classroom with
a history of learning and knowing that can be employed in classroom
practice. By assessing prior knowledge and using it in the classroom, we
can move toward a student-centered teaching style.
- Spaced
Repetition Occurs: Spaced
repetition is a concept from the behaviorist theory of learning. It explains how committing knowledge to memory occurs
best when you space out practice of a task over time. Each time you
re-engage with the concept, you have to recall it from your memory. Like
exercising a muscle, the more you exercise that little packet of memory,
the stronger it gets and the less likely you will be to forget it.
- Teachers
Focus on Structuring work to follow Logical Progression: When developing this type
of curriculum, educators and curriculum designers need to pause and
reflect on what ‘prior knowledge’ is required in order to learn something.
This explicit reflection on progression of understanding puts continual
growth at the center of the student’s learning experience.
- Integration
and Collaboration: Educators
collaborate to ensure a holistic and coherent learning sequence is
provided over time.
Disadvantages
- Time
Consuming for Designers: Curriculum
designers need to collaborate and coordinate for this model to work.
Designers and educators need to come together over several meetings to
agree on what will be taught, when, and by whom, so that the whole
curriculum is cohesive and does not miss anything or contain redundancies.
- Curriculum
Crowding: If
educators have a lot to teach, and then re-teach, the curriculum can get
too crowded. Educators might lightly touch on a concept then move on from
it with the belief that “we will return to it”. A better alternative may
be mastery teaching, where a student does not move on until they have
mastered the topic.
- Irrelevant
for Short Courses: Short
courses can return to the content in single lessons, but long-term
reinforcement is impossible if a course is only taught over a short period
of time.
- Risk
of becoming Teacher Centered: When the curriculum is designed in a longitudinal
fashion with a long horizon, the teachers make guesses about a student’s
competency level at certain times into the future. A flexible curriculum
needs to be differentiated to a student’s learning levels and speeds,
which may be unachievable if the curriculum is designed too far in
advance.
- Gap Filling: Often, a teacher will
find that instead of building on prior knowledge, they are re-teaching
information that was forgotten, taught poorly previously, the facts have
changed, or entails many misconceptions.
4) Historical approach
Science has a history
of its own and every invention or discovery has a historic background. The
historical approach emphasizes the organizing of the science course in
accordance with the evolution of science i.e the stages through which science
has passed. One limitation pointed out in the school curriculum is that it
gives importance only to the reality of objectives and devoid of human element.
But science is a grand expression of the human effort and this spirit should be
felt by every pupil. This is possible only if science is tracked biographically
hence it must be the realization of the scientific life rather than mastery of
principles and method. The pupil should be led into the spirit of the
intellectual life of great men of science.
5) Type study
In this method,
the material to be taught is classified into types. A type is that which
emplifies the characteristics of a group. It is a thing or event considered as
an example of a class or group just as a particular metal represents the
alakaline earth metals. This method is advantageous as it helps the pupils to
make their own generalizations from types. The method is based on sound
psychological principles and gives training in scientific thinking and develops
a power of observation. The main drawback of the scheme is that all the content
to be taught cannot be classified into types.
6)
Nature study
·
In it’s
simplest form, a nature study is defined as:“the practical study of plants, animals, and natural phenomena,
especially as a school subject”.It
builds connections with the world around them and establishes empathy and
awareness of the simple things that many take for granted (especially in
today’s culture). Nature study can
be described as "conceiving of the movement as a loose coalition of
communities composed of individuals, societies, and institutions able to find
some common ground in the study and appreciation of the natural world"
NATURE-STUDY, as a process, is seeing the things that one looks at, and the
drawing of proper conclusions from what one sees. Its purpose is to educate the
child in terms of his environment, to the end that his life may be fuller and
richer. Nature-study is not the study of a science, as of botany, entomology,
geology, and the like. That is, it takes the things at hand and endeavors to
understand them, without reference primarily to the systematic order or
relationships of objects. It is informal, as are the objects which one sees. It
is entirely divorced from mere definitions, or from formal explanations in
books. It is therefore supremely natural. It trains the eye and the mind to see
and to comprehend the common things of life; and the result is not directly the
acquiring of science but the establishing of a living sympathy with everything
that is.
Nature study is advantageous since it
laysthe foundation for advanced studies because all natural sciences are
specialized forms of nature study. It develops power of observation and
reasoning and establishes good relationship between child and its environment.
The drawback is there are certain topics which require exhaustive theoretical
analysis which is beyond the scope of nature study. Hence this is suitable only
for the primary classes where pupil needs only a general understanding of the
environment.
7)
Nature rambling
The main criteria are the experience of
the child. Child is considered as the rambler in his
environment. The child is considered as the member of environment. The
materials the child is likely to meet with the scientific situations be likely
to face with are chosen and arranged in the science course. Accordingly the
science course of the first year may contain the elementary study of planets,
trees sun, moon, birds, stars, and rain. In the second year the study of rock,
different kinds of rock, kinds of water, purification of water, solar system,
seasons and like. In the third year the study of sand, minerals,
atmosphere, soil, eclipse and shadows.It lays foundation for advanced studies
because all natural science is specialised forms of nature study. It develops
the power of observation reasoning and it establishes good relationships
between the child and his environment.
8)
General Science and Disciplinary approach
General Science is a course of scientific
study based on the common experiences of children. It tries to explain the laws
of nature without dividing the work into Biology, Chemistry, Physics and so on.
Usually it consists of and elementary study of the fundamental facts and
principles of various sciences organized with reference to immediate
environment of pupils. General science scheme was introduced into the school
curriculum to redeem science instruction from evils of college domination. The
general science scheme was intended to popularize science instruction by
presenting a more simple, attractive and interesting study of scientific facts
and principles in relation to the real things of life.
Merits
1. Since the method deals with the
situation in their natural setting science learned in the class will be of much
use than the daily life.
2. Since general science deals with real
problems of life, pupils develop to ability to solve practical problems of
their environment.
3. Since the pupils get fundamental
knowledge of the different branches of science they can wisely choose the
branch to be learnt in detail in the higher classes.
4. General science scheme provides unity
in school science courses.
Drawbacks
1. Selection of subjects matter
organization as a unified whole is very difficult.
2. The scheme requires teachers
proficient in all branches of science for handling all the topics effectively.
3. It does not provides students sound
knowledge of the subject matter.
4. The textbooks written in this line is
not available.
5. It requires well equipped laboratory
and libraries.
Conclusion
Curriculum is the plan for bringing desirable changes in student
behavior. There are many approaches in curriculum organization .Designing
of curriculum is associated with social, emotional and psychological factors of
a child, which aims the total development of a child in their life. Curriculum should develop the all round
development / personality among the students and also that should be keeping
similar in all the states. A well-integrated curriculum should be framed which
include the study of science, language and humanities. The correct combination
of those can develops an all round personality.